Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm/msm/dpu: point sc8280xp_dpu_cfg to sc8280xp_regdma

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 18/01/2023 04:08, Abhinav Kumar wrote:


On 1/17/2023 6:04 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
SC8280XP configuration missed the reg_dma configuration. We do not use
regdma for now, but let's put the correct pointer anyway.

Fixes: 4a352c2fc15a ("drm/msm/dpu: Introduce SC8280XP")
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.c | 2 ++
  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.c
index 4375e72a9aab..3d0fbc1746e2 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.c
@@ -2680,6 +2680,8 @@ static const struct dpu_mdss_cfg sc8280xp_dpu_cfg = {
      .intf = sc8280xp_intf,
      .vbif_count = ARRAY_SIZE(sdm845_vbif),
      .vbif = sdm845_vbif,
+    .reg_dma_count = 1,

Lets stick to the convention of the rest of the entries and use ARRAY_SIZE.

regdma is not an array, so all platforms use 1 here. We should probably change this, as some of newer platforms seem to have two regdma blocks, but I haven't taken a look into that.


+    .dma_cfg = &sc8280xp_regdma,
      .perf = &sc8280xp_perf_data,
      .mdss_irqs = IRQ_SC8280XP_MASK,
  };

--
With best wishes
Dmitry




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux