On Thu 12 Mar 02:51 PDT 2015, Mark Rutland wrote: > On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 10:30:16PM +0000, Bjorn Andersson wrote: > > Add binding documentation for the Qualcomm Hardware Mutex. > > > > Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > > > I think the conclusion on the dt binding discussion for hwspinlocks was that > > we're down to having the #hwlock-cells intact. So this version includes that, > > but non of the other previously discussed properties. > > > > Changes since v5: > > - Extracted the dt binding documentation into a separate patch > > - Moved the driver to consume a syscon > > I'm a little confused here. Why are we now using a syscon? I thought the > set of registers for the block was well-defined. > The sfpb-mutex registers make up a block (according to my documentation), but after discussing tcsr with Andy Gross we concluded that although the tcsr-mutex registers are layed out consecutively in the tcsr, they are not alone in the block. Further more Andy introduced the tcsr-syscon binding in his work to support DMA on GSBI (uart/i2c/spi), so that's why I had to make this change. Preferrably this would have showed up before v6... > If there's a link to some previous discussion on that point, it would be > helpful. > Unfortunately there isn't, as we discussed this mainly face to face a few weeks back. Regards, Bjorn -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
