On Mon, 16 Jan 2023 22:52:15 +0000, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote: > Currently we do not differentiate between the various users of the > qcom,mdss-dsi-ctrl. The driver is flexible enough to operate from one > compatible string but, the hardware does have some significant differences > in the number of clocks. > > To facilitate documenting the clocks add the following compatible strings > > - qcom,apq8064-dsi-ctrl > - qcom,msm8916-dsi-ctrl > - qcom,msm8953-dsi-ctrl > - qcom,msm8974-dsi-ctrl > - qcom,msm8996-dsi-ctrl > - qcom,msm8998-dsi-ctrl > - qcom,sc7180-dsi-ctrl > - qcom,sc7280-dsi-ctrl > - qcom,sdm660-dsi-ctrl > - qcom,sdm845-dsi-ctrl > - qcom,sm8150-dsi-ctrl > - qcom,sm8250-dsi-ctrl > - qcom,sm8350-dsi-ctrl > - qcom,sm8450-dsi-ctrl > - qcom,sm8550-dsi-ctrl > - qcom,qcm2290-dsi-ctrl > > Deprecate qcom,dsi-ctrl-6g-qcm2290 in favour of the desired format while we > do so. > > Several MDSS yaml files exist which document the dsi sub-node. > For each existing SoC MDSS yaml, provide the right dsi compat string. > > Signed-off-by: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > .../display/msm/dsi-controller-main.yaml | 30 ++++++++++++++++--- > .../bindings/display/msm/qcom,mdss.yaml | 3 +- > .../display/msm/qcom,msm8998-mdss.yaml | 8 +++-- > .../display/msm/qcom,sc7180-mdss.yaml | 6 ++-- > .../display/msm/qcom,sc7280-mdss.yaml | 6 ++-- > .../display/msm/qcom,sdm845-mdss.yaml | 8 +++-- > .../display/msm/qcom,sm8150-mdss.yaml | 8 +++-- > .../display/msm/qcom,sm8250-mdss.yaml | 8 +++-- > .../display/msm/qcom,sm8350-mdss.yaml | 6 ++-- > .../display/msm/qcom,sm8450-mdss.yaml | 4 ++- > 10 files changed, 63 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-) > Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>
