Re: [RFC PATCH 2/4] drm/msm/mdss: correct the ubwc version for sm6115 platform

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 1/13/2023 1:16 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
On Fri, 13 Jan 2023 at 21:47, Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 12/7/2022 4:08 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
According to the vendor DT, sm6115 has UBWC 1.0, not 2.0.


Can you please point me to which file you are referring to?

The internal docs I have are still showing 2.0.

If I understood correctly sm6115 = bengal, thus:

https://android.googlesource.com/kernel/msm-extra/devicetree/+/refs/heads/android-msm-bramble-4.19-android11-qpr1/qcom/bengal-sde.dtsi#103

Ok, so the cause of discrepancy was that the overall recommendation across sub-systems was to use UWBC 1.0. Thats why the DTSI has 1.0.

Hence, this change LGTM,

Reviewed-by: Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@xxxxxxxxxxx>



Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
   drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_mdss.c | 2 +-
   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_mdss.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_mdss.c
index 2219c1bd59a9..4401f945b966 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_mdss.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_mdss.c
@@ -532,7 +532,7 @@ static const struct msm_mdss_data sm8150_data = {
   };

   static const struct msm_mdss_data sm6115_data = {
-     .ubwc_version = UBWC_2_0,
+     .ubwc_version = UBWC_1_0,
       .ubwc_swizzle = 7,
       .ubwc_static = 0x11f,
   };






[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux