On 13/01/2023 16:22, Konrad Dybcio wrote: > SM4250 and SM6115 use a shared device tree and the RPMPDs are > identical. There's no need for a separate entry, so remove it. > > This reverts commit 45ac44ed10e58cf9b510e6552317ed7d2602346f. > > Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > .../devicetree/bindings/power/qcom,rpmpd.yaml | 1 - > include/dt-bindings/power/qcom-rpmpd.h | 10 ---------- > 2 files changed, 11 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/qcom,rpmpd.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/qcom,rpmpd.yaml > index 633d49884019..5bb9f59d196f 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/qcom,rpmpd.yaml > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/qcom,rpmpd.yaml > @@ -39,7 +39,6 @@ properties: > - qcom,sdm845-rpmhpd > - qcom,sdx55-rpmhpd > - qcom,sdx65-rpmhpd > - - qcom,sm4250-rpmpd Yet, dedicated compatibles are usually recommended. Maybe this should be used with fallback: "qcom,sm4250-rpmpd", "qcom,sm6115-rpmpd" ? Best regards, Krzysztof
