Re: [PATCH 6/7] arm64: dts: Add ipq9574 SoC and AL02 board support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 1/11/2023 3:14 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
On 10/01/2023 13:13, devi priya wrote:
From: POOVENDHAN SELVARAJ <quic_poovendh@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Add initial device tree support for Qualcomm IPQ9574 SoC
and AL02 board

Co-developed-by: Anusha Rao <quic_anusha@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Anusha Rao <quic_anusha@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Co-developed-by: devi priya <quic_devipriy@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: devi priya <quic_devipriy@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: POOVENDHAN SELVARAJ <quic_poovendh@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
  arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/Makefile            |   1 +
  arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq9574-al02-c7.dts |  69 ++++
  arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq9574.dtsi        | 318 +++++++++++++++++++
  3 files changed, 388 insertions(+)
  create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq9574-al02-c7.dts
  create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq9574.dtsi

diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/Makefile b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/Makefile
index 3e79496292e7..872c62028a0b 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/Makefile
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/Makefile
@@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_QCOM)	+= ipq6018-cp01-c1.dtb
  dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_QCOM)	+= ipq8074-hk01.dtb
  dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_QCOM)	+= ipq8074-hk10-c1.dtb
  dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_QCOM)	+= ipq8074-hk10-c2.dtb
+dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_QCOM)	+= ipq9574-al02-c7.dtb
  dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_QCOM)	+= msm8916-alcatel-idol347.dtb
  dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_QCOM)	+= msm8916-asus-z00l.dtb
  dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_QCOM)	+= msm8916-huawei-g7.dtb
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq9574-al02-c7.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq9574-al02-c7.dts
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..ae3c32f3e16a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq9574-al02-c7.dts
@@ -0,0 +1,69 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only

Not dual licensed? Not BSD?
Okay, will add dual license

+/*
+ * IPQ9574 AL02-C7 board device tree source
+ *
+ * Copyright (c) 2020-2021 The Linux Foundation. All rights reserved.
+ * Copyright (c) 2022 Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. All rights reserved.
+ */
+
+/dts-v1/;
+
+#include "ipq9574.dtsi"
+
+/ {
+	model = "Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. IPQ9574/AP-AL02-C7";
+	compatible = "qcom,ipq9574-ap-al02-c7", "qcom,ipq9574";
+	interrupt-parent = <&intc>;
+
+	aliases {
+		serial0 = &blsp1_uart2;
+	};
+
+	chosen {
+		stdout-path = "serial0:115200n8";
+	};
+};
+
+&blsp1_uart2 {
+	pinctrl-0 = <&uart2_pins>;
+	pinctrl-names = "default";
+	status = "okay";
+};
+
+&sdhc_1 {
+	pinctrl-0 = <&emmc_pins>;
+	pinctrl-names = "default";
+	status = "okay";
+};
+
+&tlmm {
+	emmc_pins: emmc-state {
+		emmc-clk-pins {
+			pins = "gpio5";
+			function = "sdc_clk";
+			drive-strength = <8>;
+			bias-disable;
+		};
+		emmc-cmd-pins {
+			pins = "gpio4";
+			function = "sdc_cmd";
+			drive-strength = <8>;
+			bias-pull-up;
+		};
+		emmc-data-pins {
+			pins = "gpio0", "gpio1", "gpio2",
+			     "gpio3", "gpio6", "gpio7",
+			     "gpio8", "gpio9";
+			function = "sdc_data";
+			drive-strength = <8>;
+			bias-pull-up;
+		};
+		emmc-rclk-pins {
+			pins = "gpio10";
+			function = "sdc_rclk";
+			drive-strength = <8>;
+			bias-pull-down;
+		};
+	};
+
+};
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq9574.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq9574.dtsi
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..188d18688a77
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq9574.dtsi
@@ -0,0 +1,318 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
+/*
+ * IPQ9574 SoC device tree source
+ *
+ * Copyright (c) 2020-2021 The Linux Foundation. All rights reserved.
+ * Copyright (c) 2022, Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. All rights reserved.
+ */
+
+#include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/arm-gic.h>
+#include <dt-bindings/clock/qcom,gcc-ipq9574.h>
+#include <dt-bindings/reset/qcom,gcc-ipq9574.h>
+
+/ {
+	interrupt-parent = <&intc>;
+	#address-cells = <2>;
+	#size-cells = <2>;
+
+	clocks {
+		bias_pll_ubi_nc_clk: bias_pll_ubi_nc_clk {

No undercores in node names.
Okay

+			compatible = "fixed-clock";
+			clock-frequency = <353000000>;
+			#clock-cells = <0>;
+		};
+
+		pcie30_phy0_pipe_clk: pcie30_phy0_pipe_clk {
+			compatible = "fixed-clock";
+			clock-frequency = <250000000>;
+			#clock-cells = <0>;
+		};
+
+		pcie30_phy1_pipe_clk: pcie30_phy1_pipe_clk {
+			compatible = "fixed-clock";
+			clock-frequency = <250000000>;
+			#clock-cells = <0>;
+		};
+
+		pcie30_phy2_pipe_clk: pcie30_phy2_pipe_clk {
+			compatible = "fixed-clock";
+			clock-frequency = <250000000>;
+			#clock-cells = <0>;
+		};
+
+		pcie30_phy3_pipe_clk: pcie30_phy3_pipe_clk {
+			compatible = "fixed-clock";
+			clock-frequency = <250000000>;
+			#clock-cells = <0>;
+		};
+
+		usb3phy_0_cc_pipe_clk: usb3phy_0_cc_pipe_clk {
+			compatible = "fixed-clock";
+			clock-frequency = <125000000>;
+			#clock-cells = <0>;
+		};
+
+		sleep_clk: sleep-clk {
+			compatible = "fixed-clock";
+			clock-frequency = <32000>;

That's not a property of the SoC, but board. Either entire clock or at
least frequency to indicate that the board is providing the clock.
Sure, will move it to board dts

+			#clock-cells = <0>;> +		};
+
+		xo_board_clk: xo-board-clk {
+			compatible = "fixed-clock";
+			clock-frequency = <24000000>;

Ditto.
Okay

+			#clock-cells = <0>;
+		};
+	};
+
+	cpus {
+		#address-cells = <1>;
+		#size-cells = <0>;
+
+		CPU0: cpu@0 {
+			device_type = "cpu";
+			compatible = "arm,cortex-a73";
+			reg = <0x0>;
+			enable-method = "psci";
+			next-level-cache = <&L2_0>;
+		};
+
+		CPU1: cpu@1 {
+			device_type = "cpu";
+			compatible = "arm,cortex-a73";
+			reg = <0x1>;
+			enable-method = "psci";
+			next-level-cache = <&L2_0>;
+		};
+
+		CPU2: cpu@2 {
+			device_type = "cpu";
+			compatible = "arm,cortex-a73";
+			reg = <0x2>;
+			enable-method = "psci";
+			next-level-cache = <&L2_0>;
+		};
+
+		CPU3: cpu@3 {
+			device_type = "cpu";
+			compatible = "arm,cortex-a73";
+			reg = <0x3>;
+			enable-method = "psci";
+			next-level-cache = <&L2_0>;
+		};
+
+		L2_0: l2-cache {
+			compatible = "cache";
+			cache-level = <2>;
+		};
+	};
+
+	memory@40000000 {
+		device_type = "memory";
+		/* We expect the bootloader to fill in the size */
+		reg = <0x0 0x40000000 0x0 0x0>;
+	};
+
+	pmu {
+		compatible = "arm,cortex-a73-pmu";
+		interrupts = <GIC_PPI 7 (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(4) | IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH)>;
+	};
+
+	psci {
+		compatible = "arm,psci-1.0";
+		method = "smc";
+	};
+
+	reserved-memory {
+		#address-cells = <2>;
+		#size-cells = <2>;
+		ranges;
+
+		tz_region: memory@4a600000 {
+			reg = <0x0 0x4a600000 0x0 0x400000>;
+			no-map;
+		};
+	};
+
+	soc: soc@0 {
+		#address-cells = <1>;
+		#size-cells = <1>;
+		ranges = <0 0 0 0xffffffff>;
+		compatible = "simple-bus";
+
+		tlmm: pinctrl@1000000 {
+			compatible = "qcom,ipq9574-tlmm";
+			reg = <0x01000000 0x300000>;
+			interrupts = <GIC_SPI 208 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
+			gpio-controller;
+			#gpio-cells = <2>;
+			gpio-ranges = <&tlmm 0 0 65>;
+			gpio-reserved-ranges = <59 1>;

Hm, why reserved ranges are in SoC?
As the gpio is forbidden on all ipq9574 boards, we have added it in SoC

+			interrupt-controller;
+			#interrupt-cells = <2>;
+
+			uart2_pins: uart2-state {
+				pins = "gpio34", "gpio35";
+				function = "blsp2_uart";
+				drive-strength = <8>;
+				bias-disable;
+			};
+		};
+
+		gcc: clock-controller@1800000 {
+			compatible = "qcom,gcc-ipq9574";
+			reg = <0x1800000 0x80000>;
+			clocks = <&xo_board_clk>,
+				<&sleep_clk>,
+				<&bias_pll_ubi_nc_clk>,
+				<&pcie30_phy0_pipe_clk>,
+				<&pcie30_phy1_pipe_clk>,
+				<&pcie30_phy2_pipe_clk>,
+				<&pcie30_phy3_pipe_clk>,
+				<&usb3phy_0_cc_pipe_clk>;
+			clock-names = "xo",
+				"sleep_clk",

Misaligned. Multiple other places probably as well.
Sure, will do

+				"bias_pll_ubi_nc_clk",
+				"pcie30_phy0_pipe_clk",
+				"pcie30_phy1_pipe_clk",
+				"pcie30_phy2_pipe_clk",
+				"pcie30_phy3_pipe_clk",
+				"usb3phy_0_cc_pipe_clk";
+			#clock-cells = <1>;
+			#reset-cells = <1>;
+		};
+
+		sdhc_1: sdhci@7804000 {
+			compatible = "qcom,sdhci-msm-v5";
+			reg = <0x7804000 0x1000>, <0x7805000 0x1000>;
+			reg-names = "hc_mem", "cmdq_mem";
+
+			interrupts = <GIC_SPI 123 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
+				   <GIC_SPI 138 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;

Like here.
Okay

+			interrupt-names = "hc_irq", "pwr_irq";
+
+			clocks = <&xo_board_clk>,
+			       <&gcc GCC_SDCC1_AHB_CLK>,
+			       <&gcc GCC_SDCC1_APPS_CLK>;

And here
Okay

+			clock-names = "xo", "iface", "core";

Does not look like you tested the bindings. Please run `make
dt_binding_check` (see
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/writing-schema.rst for instructions).
Sure, will do

+			mmc-ddr-1_8v;
+			mmc-hs200-1_8v;
+			mmc-hs400-1_8v;
+			mmc-hs400-enhanced-strobe;
+			max-frequency = <384000000>;
+			bus-width = <8>;
+			non-removable;
+			status = "disabled";
+		};
+
+		blsp1_uart2: serial@78b1000 {
+			compatible = "qcom,msm-uartdm-v1.4", "qcom,msm-uartdm";
+			reg = <0x078b1000 0x200>;
+			interrupts = <GIC_SPI 306 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
+			clocks = <&gcc GCC_BLSP1_UART3_APPS_CLK>,
+				 <&gcc GCC_BLSP1_AHB_CLK>;
+			clock-names = "core", "iface";
+			status = "disabled";
+		};
+
+		intc: interrupt-controller@b000000 {
+			compatible = "qcom,msm-qgic2";
+			reg = <0x0b000000 0x1000>,  /* GICD */
+			      <0x0b002000 0x1000>,  /* GICC */
+			      <0x0b001000 0x1000>,  /* GICH */
+			      <0x0b004000 0x1000>;  /* GICV */
+			#address-cells = <1>;
+			#size-cells = <1>;
+			interrupt-controller;
+			#interrupt-cells = <3>;
+			interrupts = <GIC_PPI 9 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
+			ranges = <0 0x0b00c000 0x3000>;
+
+			v2m0: v2m@0 {
+				compatible = "arm,gic-v2m-frame";
+				reg = <0x0 0xffd>;
+				msi-controller;
+			};
+
+			v2m1: v2m@1 {
+				compatible = "arm,gic-v2m-frame";
+				reg = <0x1000 0xffd>;
+				msi-controller;
+			};
+
+			v2m2: v2m@2 {
+				compatible = "arm,gic-v2m-frame";
+				reg = <0x2000 0xffd>;
+				msi-controller;
+			};
+		};
+
+		timer@b120000 {
+			compatible = "arm,armv7-timer-mem";
+			reg = <0xb120000 0x1000>;
+			#address-cells = <1>;
+			#size-cells = <1>;
+			ranges;
+			clock-frequency = <24000000>;
+
+			frame@b120000 {
+				reg = <0xb121000 0x1000>,
+				      <0xb122000 0x1000>;
+				frame-number = <0>;
+				interrupts = <GIC_SPI 8 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
+					     <GIC_SPI 7 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
+			};
+
+			frame@b123000 {
+				reg = <0xb123000 0x1000>;
+				frame-number = <1>;
+				interrupts = <GIC_SPI 9 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
+				status = "disabled";
+			};
+
+			frame@b124000 {
+				reg = <0xb124000 0x1000>;
+				frame-number = <2>;
+				interrupts = <GIC_SPI 10 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
+				status = "disabled";
+			};
+
+			frame@b125000 {
+				reg = <0xb125000 0x1000>;
+				frame-number = <3>;
+				interrupts = <GIC_SPI 11 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
+				status = "disabled";
+			};
+
+			frame@b126000 {
+				reg = <0xb126000 0x1000>;
+				frame-number = <4>;
+				interrupts = <GIC_SPI 12 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
+				status = "disabled";
+			};
+
+			frame@b127000 {
+				reg = <0xb127000 0x1000>;
+				frame-number = <5>;
+				interrupts = <GIC_SPI 13 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
+				status = "disabled";
+			};
+
+			frame@b128000 {
+				reg = <0xb128000 0x1000>;
+				frame-number = <6>;
+				interrupts = <GIC_SPI 14 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
+				status = "disabled";
+			};
+		};
+	};
+
+	timer {
+		compatible = "arm,armv8-timer";
+		interrupts = <GIC_PPI 2 (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(4) | IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW)>,
+			     <GIC_PPI 3 (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(4) | IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW)>,
+			     <GIC_PPI 4 (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(4) | IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW)>,
+			     <GIC_PPI 1 (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(4) | IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW)>;
+		clock-frequency = <24000000>;

Is this allowed in recent designs?
Okay, will drop

+	};
+};

Best regards,
Krzysztof

Best Regards,
Devi Priya



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux