On 10/01/2023 19:58, forbidden405@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > I removed Cc temporary because I had sent them the same email once. No need > to send the email to them again. > >> On 10/01/2023 19:30 krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx wrote: > >> You install this kernel with DTB on some device so clearly you have such >> device >> in hand, right? It has then some manufacturer, some company. If it is USB >> stick >> as you said, then it has even vendor ID, which might be or might not be >> real. > > The vendor extracted from `/system/build.prop` and USB vendor ID is fake, > even IMEI is stolen from some other mobile phones. Seems like the vendor > deliberately tries to be anonymous. Some people had tried to extract info > from stock firmware and on the Internet. But until now, we have no clear > evidence to know the manufacturer. Then I am not sure if we want to support such devices mainline. It is not only anonymity but simply not following standards and practices. What's more there is no guarantee what this device is. If there is no known manufacturer, anytime another device from anyone can claim it is also uf896. IOW, what guarantees you have that other person who has something looking like "uf896" actually has something the same as you and can use your DTB? I don't know how to reasonably support entirely unknown devices. Best regards, Krzysztof
