Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] dt-bindings: firmware: qcom: scm: Separate VMIDs from header to bindings

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 09/01/2023 10:39, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> With changes to the rmtfs binding, secure VMIDs will become useful to
> have in device trees. Separate them out and add to include/dt-bindings.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> v2 -> v3:
> New patch
> 
>  include/dt-bindings/firmware/qcom/scm.h | 16 ++++++++++++++++
>  include/linux/qcom_scm.h                |  7 ++-----
>  2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/firmware/qcom/scm.h
> 
> diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/firmware/qcom/scm.h b/include/dt-bindings/firmware/qcom/scm.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..d66818cd57a8
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/include/dt-bindings/firmware/qcom/scm.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */

Only Codeaurora folks contributed these numbers, thus we can relicense
it to dual-license, I believe.

The other topic is what do these numbers represent: hardware interface?
registers? offsets? firmware? IOW, why bindings is the place for them?
(usefulness for DTS is not the reason)


Best regards,
Krzysztof




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux