On Wed, 2015-03-04 at 11:05 -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote: > On 03/04/15 02:19, Ivan T. Ivanov wrote: > > + > > +static const struct of_device_id pmic_spmi_id_table[] = { > > + [COMMON_SUBTYPE] = { .compatible = "qcom,spmi-pmic" }, > > + [PM8941_SUBTYPE] = { .compatible = "qcom,pm8941" }, > > + [PM8841_SUBTYPE] = { .compatible = "qcom,pm8841" }, > > + [PM8019_SUBTYPE] = { .compatible = "qcom,pm8019" }, > > + [PM8226_SUBTYPE] = { .compatible = "qcom,pm8226" }, > > + [PM8110_SUBTYPE] = { .compatible = "qcom,pm8110" }, > > + [PMA8084_SUBTYPE] = { .compatible = "qcom,pma8084" }, > > + [PMI8962_SUBTYPE] = { .compatible = "qcom,pmi8962" }, > > + [PMD9635_SUBTYPE] = { .compatible = "qcom,pmd9635" }, > > + [PM8994_SUBTYPE] = { .compatible = "qcom,pm8994" }, > > + [PMI8994_SUBTYPE] = { .compatible = "qcom,pmi8994" }, > > + [PM8916_SUBTYPE] = { .compatible = "qcom,pm8916" }, > > + [PM8004_SUBTYPE] = { .compatible = "qcom,pm8004" }, > > + [PM8909_SUBTYPE] = { .compatible = "qcom,pm8909" }, > > + { } > > +}; > > Also this seems error prone in the case where we may have skips between > pmic model numbers and then the of_device_id table is going to have a > sentinel in the middle of the table. It's probably better to store the > subtype number in the data field and iterate over the array. True. Will reorganize. Thanks, Ivan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html