Re: [PATCH v6 03/11] dt-bindings: display/msm: add sm8350 and sm8450 DSI PHYs

[Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On 06/01/2023 17:39, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 07/12/2022 02:22, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > SM8350 and SM8450 platforms use the same driver and same bindings as the
> > existing 7nm DSI PHYs. Add corresponding compatibility strings.
> >
> > Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >   Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dsi-phy-7nm.yaml | 2 ++
> >   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dsi-phy-7nm.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dsi-phy-7nm.yaml
> > index c851770bbdf2..bffd161fedfd 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dsi-phy-7nm.yaml
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dsi-phy-7nm.yaml
> > @@ -15,6 +15,8 @@ allOf:
> >   properties:
> >     compatible:
> >       enum:
> > +      - qcom,dsi-phy-5nm-8350
> > +      - qcom,dsi-phy-5nm-8450
>
> If this patch was not merged (so far nothing in next), can we make it
> proper SoC compatible?

Ack. Bjorn has merged the dtsi bits, but I'll send a fixup.

> qcom,sm8450-dsi-phy-5nm
>
> The SC7280 already uses such pattern.
>
> >         - qcom,dsi-phy-7nm
> >         - qcom,dsi-phy-7nm-8150
> >         - qcom,sc7280-dsi-phy-7nm
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof

--
With best wishes
Dmitry