On Sat, 17 Dec 2022 00:42:12 +0100 Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Whoops, that tile must of course have started with: > > iio: adc: qcom-spmi-adc5: > > instead of blindly copying the suffix from the thermal monitor patch > (this driver is not a thermal monitor...). I'll send a v2 if there are > no other objections, unless this can be fixed up when the patch is > applied. Fixed up whilst applying. Applied to the togreg branch of iio.git, but only pushed out as testing for now as I want to rebase the branch on rc1 once available. Jonathan > > On 2022-12-16 20:09:45, Marijn Suijten wrote: > > Much like 807efb7102e8 ("thermal: qcom-spmi-adc-tm5: suppress > > probe-deferral error message") the ADC5 driver also spams a similar > > probe-deferral error on startup when a channel is not yet available: > > > > [ 0.343136] qcom-spmi-adc-tm5 1c40000.spmi:pmic@0:adc-tm@3500: get dt data failed: -517 > > > > Suppress it by using dev_err_probe instead, which also takes care of > > storing the message as reason for deferring. > > > > Signed-off-by: Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > drivers/iio/adc/qcom-spmi-adc5.c | 6 ++---- > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/qcom-spmi-adc5.c b/drivers/iio/adc/qcom-spmi-adc5.c > > index 821fee60a765..69cc36004b5a 100644 > > --- a/drivers/iio/adc/qcom-spmi-adc5.c > > +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/qcom-spmi-adc5.c > > @@ -894,10 +894,8 @@ static int adc5_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > > mutex_init(&adc->lock); > > > > ret = adc5_get_fw_data(adc); > > - if (ret) { > > - dev_err(dev, "adc get dt data failed\n"); > > - return ret; > > - } > > + if (ret) > > + return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "adc get dt data failed\n"); > > > > irq_eoc = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0); > > if (irq_eoc < 0) { > > -- > > 2.39.0 > > > > Apologies for the clumsiness. > > - Marijn