On Tue, Dec 20, 2022 at 02:28:51PM -0500, Brian Masney wrote: > Add the missing nodes for the i2c buses that's present on this SoC. > > This work was derived from various patches that Qualcomm delivered > to Red Hat in a downstream kernel. > > Signed-off-by: Brian Masney <bmasney@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > Changes from v2 to v3 > - None > > Changes from v1 to v2 > - Dropped qupX_ prefix from labels. (Johan) > > arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc8280xp.dtsi | 352 +++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 352 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc8280xp.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc8280xp.dtsi > index f1111cd7f679..a502d4e19d98 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc8280xp.dtsi > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc8280xp.dtsi > @@ -813,6 +813,38 @@ qup2: geniqup@8c0000 { > > status = "disabled"; > > + i2c16: i2c@880000 { > + compatible = "qcom,geni-i2c"; > + reg = <0 0x00880000 0 0x4000>; > + clocks = <&gcc GCC_QUPV3_WRAP2_S0_CLK>; > + clock-names = "se"; > + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 373 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>; > + #address-cells = <1>; > + #size-cells = <0>; I'm aware that the two current i2c nodes has these two properties here in the middle, but would you mind moving '#address-cells' and '#size-cells' after 'reg' instead where I'd expect them to be? Same for the spi patch. I can clean up the existing two nodes (and binding example) unless you want to do it. > + power-domains = <&rpmhpd SC8280XP_CX>; > + interconnects = <&clk_virt MASTER_QUP_CORE_2 0 &clk_virt SLAVE_QUP_CORE_2 0>, > + <&gem_noc MASTER_APPSS_PROC 0 &config_noc SLAVE_QUP_2 0>, > + <&aggre1_noc MASTER_QUP_2 0 &mc_virt SLAVE_EBI1 0>; > + interconnect-names = "qup-core", "qup-config", "qup-memory"; > + status = "disabled"; > + }; Johan