Re: [PATCH v3 10/11] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8350-hdk: Enable display & dsi nodes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 5 Dec 2022 at 17:44, Dmitry Baryshkov
<dmitry.baryshkov@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 05/12/2022 18:37, Robert Foss wrote:
> > Enable the display subsystem and the dsi0 output for
> > the sm8350-hdk board.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Robert Foss <robert.foss@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >   arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8350-hdk.dts | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> >   1 file changed, 22 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8350-hdk.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8350-hdk.dts
> > index e6deb08c6da0..39462c659c58 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8350-hdk.dts
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8350-hdk.dts
> > @@ -213,10 +213,32 @@ &cdsp {
> >       firmware-name = "qcom/sm8350/cdsp.mbn";
> >   };
> >
> > +&dispcc {
> > +     status = "okay";
> > +};
> > +
> > +&dsi0 {
>
> Bjorn suggested using mdss_dsi0 / mdss_dsi0_phy labels for DSI host and
> PHY, as it allows us to group them nicely. WDYT?

Sounds quite reasonable, fixing it in dts/dtsi/binding.

>
> > +     vdda-supply = <&vreg_l6b_1p2>;
> > +     status = "okay";
> > +};
> > +
> > +&dsi0_phy  {
> > +     vdds-supply = <&vreg_l5b_0p88>;
> > +     status = "okay";
> > +};
> > +
> >   &gpi_dma1 {
> >       status = "okay";
> >   };
> >
> > +&mdss {
> > +     status = "okay";
> > +};
> > +
> > +&mdss_mdp {
> > +     status = "okay";
> > +};
> > +
> >   &mpss {
> >       status = "okay";
> >       firmware-name = "qcom/sm8350/modem.mbn";
>
> --
> With best wishes
> Dmitry
>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux