On 2022-12-14 16:06:05, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> Allow qcom,board-id and qcom,msm-id leagcy properties on these older
> platforms: MSM8956, SDM636 and SM4250. Also mention more OnePlus
> devices using modified qcom,board-id field.
>
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml | 5 +++++
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml
> index d45e2129fce3..cfb7f5caf606 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml
> @@ -925,15 +925,18 @@ allOf:
> - qcom,apq8026
> - qcom,apq8094
> - qcom,apq8096
> + - qcom,msm8956
I am certain this (and msm8976) were added in [1] but it somehow got
lost when that was merged as 05c0c38dc752 ("dt-bindings: arm: qcom:
Document msm8956 and msm8976 SoC and devices")?
Should we also add qcom,msm8976 or only when a user for that board is
added?
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20221111120156.48040-9-angelogioacchino.delregno@xxxxxxxxxxxxx/
> - qcom,msm8992
> - qcom,msm8994
> - qcom,msm8996
> - qcom,msm8998
> - qcom,sdm630
> - qcom,sdm632
> + - qcom,sdm636
> - qcom,sdm845
> - qcom,sdx55
> - qcom,sdx65
> + - qcom,sm4250
qcom,sm6115 could be added as well unless you rather leave that to the
person(s) adding the board compatible later on.
- Marijn
> - qcom,sm6125
> - qcom,sm6350
> - qcom,sm7225
> @@ -957,6 +960,8 @@ allOf:
> - oneplus,dumpling
> - oneplus,enchilada
> - oneplus,fajita
> + - oneplus,oneplus3
> + - oneplus,oneplus3t
> then:
> properties:
> qcom,board-id:
> --
> 2.34.1
>
