On 13/12/2022 18:31, Abhinav Kumar wrote: > > > On 12/13/2022 5:13 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >> On 13/12/2022 00:41, Abhinav Kumar wrote: >>>>> >>>>> besides, i think i have to sent the whole series patches include this >>>>> one to address your new comments on other patch. >>>>> >>>>> is this correct? >>>> >>>> No. Please fix your system first, validate your patches and send them >>>> afterwards. You can not expect others to do your job. >>>> >>> >>> Just finished working with kuogee on this. This issue had been reported >>> by few others earlier (example >>> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/bc9be279-a130-d5e7-4397-bbb389d14403@xxxxxxxxx/T/). >> >> This report says: >> "Sorry for the inconvenience, please ignore this false positive." >> > > That was one of them, and I dont think its false, maybe because after > fixing the PATH issues, the user deemed them as false. > > Here is another one > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/devicetree-bindings/patch/20210812174209.1970-3-bbudiredla@xxxxxxxxxxx/ > with the same report but no resolution. Thanks. Could be also Python mismatch. `make dt_binding_check` could use dtschema from Python2 but the reporter used Python3 for checking the version: `pip3 show dtschema` > > So i thought for the benefit of others I would atleast summarize how we > resolved them. Sure, that's helpful. Best regards, Krzysztof
