Re: [PATCH 1/4] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7180: move QUP and QSPI opp tables out of SoC node

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 12/12/2022 10:18, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> 
> 
> On 12.12.2022 10:17, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 12/12/2022 10:15, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +	qup_opp_table: opp-table-qup {
>>>>>> +		compatible = "operating-points-v2";
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +		opp-75000000 {
>>>>>> +			opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <75000000>;
>>>>>> +			required-opps = <&rpmhpd_opp_low_svs>;
>>>>>> +		};
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +		opp-100000000 {
>>>>>> +			opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <100000000>;
>>>>>> +			required-opps = <&rpmhpd_opp_svs>;
>>>>>> +		};
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +		opp-128000000 {
>>>>>> +			opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <128000000>;
>>>>>> +			required-opps = <&rpmhpd_opp_nom>;
>>>>>> +		};
>>>>>> +	};
>>>>>> +
>>>>>>  	memory@80000000 {
>>>>> Sidenote: memory@ should be moved above opp-*, alphabetically
>>>>>
>>>>> For this:
>>>>>
>>>>> Reviewed-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>
>>>> You sure? Because before there is already opp for cpu...
>>> Which are called opp-table-cpuN and not cpuN-opp-table, 'm' comes
>>> before 'o'.
>>
>> So you want to have broken order?
>> opp-table-cpu
>> memory
>> opp-table-qup
>> ?
>>
>> They are at least all together in my patch.
> No, I meant:
> 
> memory
> opp-table-cpu
> opp-table-qup

OK, I'll correct the opp-table-cpu/memory order in separate patch.

Best regards,
Krzysztof




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux