On Thu, Nov 17, 2022 at 03:48:06PM +0800, ye.xingchen@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> From: ye xingchen <ye.xingchen@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Replace the open-code with device_match_of_node().
>
> Signed-off-by: ye xingchen <ye.xingchen@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/soc/qcom/smem_state.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/qcom/smem_state.c b/drivers/soc/qcom/smem_state.c
> index e848cc9a3cf8..a7844841a727 100644
> --- a/drivers/soc/qcom/smem_state.c
> +++ b/drivers/soc/qcom/smem_state.c
> @@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ static struct qcom_smem_state *of_node_to_state(struct device_node *np)
> mutex_lock(&list_lock);
>
> list_for_each_entry(state, &smem_states, list) {
> - if (state->of_node == np) {
> + if (device_match_of_node(state, np)) {
I don't find this form easier to read, nor is state a struct device *...
Regards,
Bjorn
> kref_get(&state->refcount);
> goto unlock;
> }
> --
> 2.25.1
