On Fri, 2 Dec 2022 20:58:35 +0200, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> Both RPM and RPMH clocks use platform (SoC) as a part of the clock
> definition. However there is nothing really SoC-specific in this
> part. Using it just leads to confusion and sometimes to duplication of
> definitions. Drop the SoC name where it is logical.
>
> Changes since v2:
> - Additional rework of ARC/VRM clock handling as suggested by Alex
>
> [...]
Applied, thanks!
[1/8] clk: qcom: rpmh: group clock definitions together
commit: 82349cc0d1f70df9436da2f565ec10aadf1c3680
[2/8] clk: qcom: rpmh: reuse common duplicate clocks
commit: 65b0c564a34f38832b25b0f5769e9cdf9e5faefd
[3/8] clk: qcom: rpmh: drop all _ao names
commit: 012c226fc68afe32acd7da01a0c2d2e483143bd4
[4/8] clk: qcom: rpmh: remove platform names from BCM clocks
commit: fe20294f4b7b180acc1ab7dcb7feff8601c76d7d
[5/8] clk: qcom: rpmh: support separate symbol name for the RPMH clocks
commit: 49e4aa233c6c239f814e8872d6757455e49e8106
[6/8] clk: qcom: rpmh: rename ARC clock data
commit: 166eb3eb3bb394255a9a8aa4cadbba5567ba184a
[7/8] clk: qcom: rpmh: rename VRM clock data
commit: 6ad844d739ee57779d3814fe3c9f97dff68719b2
[8/8] clk: qcom: rpmh: remove usage of platform name
commit: ec304d02b988132ac037c5b41fe375950c55de87
Best regards,
--
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@xxxxxxxxxx>
