dev_err() statements are better to use than pr_err(), so switch to
those.
In a similar vein, the check on the dev_req_params pointer here is
not needed, the two places this function is called never pass in a
NULL pointer, so instead of using dev_err() there just remove it.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Halaney <ahalaney@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c | 8 +-------
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c b/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c
index b1fcff1fad0c..4350c44a6fc7 100644
--- a/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c
+++ b/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c
@@ -680,12 +680,6 @@ static int ufs_qcom_pwr_change_notify(struct ufs_hba *hba,
struct ufs_dev_params ufs_qcom_cap;
int ret = 0;
- if (!dev_req_params) {
- pr_err("%s: incoming dev_req_params is NULL\n", __func__);
- ret = -EINVAL;
- goto out;
- }
-
switch (status) {
case PRE_CHANGE:
ufshcd_init_pwr_dev_param(&ufs_qcom_cap);
@@ -709,7 +703,7 @@ static int ufs_qcom_pwr_change_notify(struct ufs_hba *hba,
dev_max_params,
dev_req_params);
if (ret) {
- pr_err("%s: failed to determine capabilities\n",
+ dev_err(hba->dev, "%s: failed to determine capabilities\n",
__func__);
goto out;
}
--
2.38.1
