On 28/11/2022 16:51, Doug Anderson wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Nov 24, 2022 at 1:29 AM Krzysztof Kozlowski > <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>> 2. >>> I notice Kryzysztof say he didn't in cc mail loop at beggin, and below is >>> my updated mail list: >>> --- >>> Series-to: LKML <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> Series-cc: Douglas Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> Series-cc: Bob Moragues <moragues@xxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> Series-cc: Harvey <hunge@xxxxxxxxxx> >>> Series-cc: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@xxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> Series-cc: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@xxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> Series-cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> >>> --- >>> Is there anyone I missed? >> >> These are not correct addresses and not complete list of them. Don't >> invent the entries, don't add there some weird addresses. >> >> Use get_maintainers.pl. That's it. Nothing more, nothing less. > > Just to give context here, I think Owen is using `patman` [0] to send > patches. Yes, it's part of the u-boot tree but it's designed for > sending Linux patches too. > > By default, that means that get_maintainer is automatically called on > all patches and those entries are CCed. The extra "Series-cc" just > lets you add extra people. It's fine to add extra people to patches if > you think that those people are interested in getting it. The tool is just the tool, if it uses get_maintainers.pl, then result would be correct. The problem was that CC list on v1 and v2: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-devicetree/20221117094251.2.Ibfc4751e4ba044d1caa1f88a16015e7c45c7db65@changeid/ https://lore.kernel.org/linux-devicetree/20221122203635.v2.1.Ie05fd439d0b271b927acb25c2a6e41af7a927e90@changeid/ As you can notice there easily: 1. Bjorn's address is wrong 2. My and Konrad's are missing So if you say that get_maintainers.pl were used and tree is not v5.15, then what else? Best regards, Krzysztof
