On 18/11/2022 19:22, Melody Olvera wrote: > Add documentation for virtual rpmh devices. These interconnects > are not controlled by the application processor and thus > require separate bindings. Also, move compatibles for sm8450 to > this document and add them for QDU1000/QRU1000 platforms. > > Signed-off-by: Melody Olvera <quic_molvera@xxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > .../bindings/interconnect/qcom,rpmh-virt.yaml | 55 +++++++++++++++++++ > .../bindings/interconnect/qcom,rpmh.yaml | 2 - > 2 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interconnect/qcom,rpmh-virt.yaml > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interconnect/qcom,rpmh-virt.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interconnect/qcom,rpmh-virt.yaml > new file mode 100644 > index 000000000000..5cbaa51df863 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interconnect/qcom,rpmh-virt.yaml > @@ -0,0 +1,55 @@ > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR BSD-2-Clause) > +%YAML 1.2 > +--- > +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/interconnect/qcom,rpmh-virt.yaml# > +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml# > + > +title: Qualcomm RPMh Virtual Network-On-Chip Interconnect > + > +maintainers: > + - Georgi Djakov <georgi.djakov@xxxxxxxxxx> > + - Odelu Kukatla <quic_okukatla@xxxxxxxxxxx> > + > +description: | > + RPMh interconnect providers support system bandwidth requirements through > + RPMh hardware accelerators known as Bus Clock Manager (BCM). The provider is > + able to communicate with the BCM through the Resource State Coordinator (RSC) > + associated with each execution environment. Provider nodes must point to at > + least one RPMh device child node pertaining to their RSC and each provider > + can map to multiple RPMh resources. Virtual interconnect providers are not > + controlled by AP and do not support QoS; they should not have associated > + register regions. > + > +allOf: > + - $ref: qcom,rpmh-common.yaml# > + > +properties: > + compatible: > + enum: > + - qcom,qdu1000-clk-virt > + - qcom,qdu1000-mc-virt > + - qcom,sm8450-clk-virt > + - qcom,sm8450-mc-virt You should also move qcom,sdx65-mc-virt, qcom,sc8280xp-mc-virt, qcom,sc8280xp-clk-virt and more. > + > + '#interconnect-cells': true > + > +required: > + - compatible > + > +unevaluatedProperties: false > + > +examples: > + - | > + #include <dt-bindings/interconnect/qcom,sm8450.h> > + > + clk_virt: interconnect-0 { > + compatible = "qcom,sm8450-clk-virt"; > + #interconnect-cells = <2>; > + qcom,bcm-voters = <&apps_bcm_voter>; > + }; > + > + mc_virt: interconnect-1 { > + compatible = "qcom,sm8450-mc-virt"; > + #interconnect-cells = <2>; > + qcom,bcm-voters = <&apps_bcm_voter>; These are exactly the same examples, so just keep one. Best regards, Krzysztof