Hi Jonathan, On Sonntag, 6. November 2022 13:13:10 CET Jonathan Cameron wrote: > On Wed, 2 Nov 2022 11:31:36 -0500 > > Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 31, 2022 at 07:24:54PM +0100, Luca Weiss wrote: > > > As in other bindings, let's use specific compatibles together with the > > > fallback compatible. Adjust the bindings for it. > > > > You should state users are already doing this. > > I can fix that up whilst applying. However it raises the question: > Should I treat this as a fix, or a tidy up (that can wait for next merge > window)? > > I'm also fine with this going with the other patch in the series (that lore > found for me as it didn't go to linux-iio) if that makes more sense. > Sorry for the delay in answering. The dts patch (2/2) has already been picked up through qcom tree, so I think you can apply this one to your tree. It's definitely not urgent, so next merge window would be perfect. Regards Luca > If that happens > > Acked-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Jonathan > > > > Signed-off-by: Luca Weiss <luca@xxxxxxxxx> > > > --- > > > Changes in v2: > > > * New patch > > > > > > .../devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/qcom,spmi-iadc.yaml | 7 +++++-- > > > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>