On 18/11/2022 15:29, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
On 08/11/2022 12:46, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
On 08/11/2022 02:56, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
Currently we do not differentiate between the various users of the
qcom,mdss-dsi-ctrl. The driver is flexible enough to operate from one
compatible string but, the hardware does have some significant
differences
in the number of clocks.
To facilitate documenting the clocks add the following compatible
strings
- qcom,mdss-dsi-ctrl-apq8064
Generic comment: I think we'd better follow the arm/qcom-soc.yaml and
use qcom,soc-something as compat string. This would leave us with
qcom,apq8064-dsi-ctrl
I'm not sure if we want to follow the qcm2290 approach and encode the
DSI ctrl revision here (6g vs v2).
For qcm2290 I'm thinking qcm2290-dsi-ctrl - without the 6g piece.
This sounds good too.
a) Nobody is using the compat at the moment
b) I'm not sure what - if any real information the silicon version
number conveys here.
+ Loic, Shawn
---
bod
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
