Hi,
On 11/11/2022 5:24 PM, Luca Weiss wrote:
Leaving wakeup enabled during probe fail (-EPROBE_DEFER) or remove makes
the subsequent probe fail.
[ 3.749454] remoteproc remoteproc0: releasing 3000000.remoteproc
[ 3.752949] qcom_q6v5_pas: probe of 3000000.remoteproc failed with error -17
[ 3.878935] remoteproc remoteproc0: releasing 4080000.remoteproc
[ 3.887602] qcom_q6v5_pas: probe of 4080000.remoteproc failed with error -17
[ 4.319552] remoteproc remoteproc0: releasing 8300000.remoteproc
[ 4.332716] qcom_q6v5_pas: probe of 8300000.remoteproc failed with error -17
Fix this by disabling wakeup in both cases so the driver can properly
probe on the next try.
Fixes: a781e5aa5911 ("remoteproc: core: Prevent system suspend during remoteproc recovery")
Fixes: dc86c129b4fb ("remoteproc: qcom: pas: Mark devices as wakeup capable")
Signed-off-by: Luca Weiss <luca.weiss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
LGTM.
Reviewed-by: Mukesh Ojha <quic_mojha@xxxxxxxxxxx>
-Mukesh
---
drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_pas.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_pas.c b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_pas.c
index 6afd0941e552..d830bf13c32c 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_pas.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_pas.c
@@ -557,6 +557,7 @@ static int adsp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
adsp_pds_detach(adsp, adsp->proxy_pds, adsp->proxy_pd_count);
free_rproc:
rproc_free(rproc);
+ device_init_wakeup(adsp->dev, false);
return ret;
}
@@ -573,6 +574,7 @@ static int adsp_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
qcom_remove_smd_subdev(adsp->rproc, &adsp->smd_subdev);
qcom_remove_ssr_subdev(adsp->rproc, &adsp->ssr_subdev);
rproc_free(adsp->rproc);
+ device_init_wakeup(adsp->dev, false);
return 0;
}