Re: [PATCH v2] bus: mhi: host: Disable preemption while processing data events

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11/14/2022 2:58 AM, Qiang Yu wrote:
If data processing of an event is scheduled out because core
is busy handling multiple irqs, this can starve the processing
of MHI M0 state change event on another core. Fix this issue by
disabling irq on the core processing data events.

Signed-off-by: Qiang Yu <quic_qianyu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
v1->v2: add comments about why we disable local irq

  drivers/bus/mhi/host/main.c | 11 +++++++++--
  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/bus/mhi/host/main.c b/drivers/bus/mhi/host/main.c
index f3aef77a..fcb2586 100644
--- a/drivers/bus/mhi/host/main.c
+++ b/drivers/bus/mhi/host/main.c
@@ -1027,13 +1027,20 @@ int mhi_process_data_event_ring(struct mhi_controller *mhi_cntrl,
void mhi_ev_task(unsigned long data)
  {
+	unsigned long flags;
  	struct mhi_event *mhi_event = (struct mhi_event *)data;
  	struct mhi_controller *mhi_cntrl = mhi_event->mhi_cntrl;
/* process all pending events */
-	spin_lock_bh(&mhi_event->lock);
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&mhi_event->lock, flags);
+	/*
+	 * When muiltiple IRQs come, the tasklet will be scheduled out with event ring lock

multiple

+	 * remaining acquired, causing M0 event process on another core gets stuck when it
+	 * tries to acquire the same event ring lock. Thus let's disable local IRQs here.
+	 */
+
  	mhi_event->process_event(mhi_cntrl, mhi_event, U32_MAX);
-	spin_unlock_bh(&mhi_event->lock);
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&mhi_event->lock, flags);
  }
void mhi_ctrl_ev_task(unsigned long data)




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux