On Sat, Nov 12, 2022 at 10:43:14AM +0300, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On 11/11/2022 11:56, Johan Hovold wrote:
> > It does not really make any sense to keep separate configuration
> > structures for the USB and DP parts of the same PHY so merge them.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp-combo.c | 182 +++++++---------------
> > 1 file changed, 57 insertions(+), 125 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp-combo.c b/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp-combo.c
> > index b27d1821116c..249912b75964 100644
> > --- a/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp-combo.c
> > +++ b/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp-combo.c
> > @@ -798,10 +798,7 @@ static const u8 qmp_dp_v5_voltage_swing_hbr_rbr[4][4] = {
> >
> > struct qmp_phy;
> >
> > -/* struct qmp_phy_cfg - per-PHY initialization config */
> > struct qmp_phy_cfg {
> > - /* phy-type - PCIE/UFS/USB */
> > - unsigned int type;
> > int lanes;
>
> int lanes doesn't really make sense here in my opinion. It should be
> usb_lanes and dp_lanes.
It doesn't make much less sense than having it here currently do.
All of these USB-C PHYs are dual lane for bi-directional SS USB and
quad lane for uni-directional DP (even if only CC1 orientation and lanes
2 and 3 are currently supported).
I should probably just drop the lanes parameter completely, either as a
preparatory clean up or as follow-on one (e.g. also a bit depending on
if there are other reasons for respinning a v2).
Johan
