On 11/11/22 08:55, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
Add EPSS L3 compatibles for sm8350 and sc8280xp, but while at it also
introduce generic compatible for both qcom,osm-l3 and qcom,epss-l3.
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <quic_bjorande@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Tested-by: Steev Klimaszewski <steev@xxxxxxxx>
---
Changes since v1:
- Fixed oneOf to be valid schema
- Fixed example to follow schema
.../bindings/interconnect/qcom,osm-l3.yaml | 24 ++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interconnect/qcom,osm-l3.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interconnect/qcom,osm-l3.yaml
index bf538c0c5a81..aadae4424ba9 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interconnect/qcom,osm-l3.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interconnect/qcom,osm-l3.yaml
@@ -16,13 +16,21 @@ description:
properties:
compatible:
- enum:
- - qcom,sc7180-osm-l3
- - qcom,sc7280-epss-l3
- - qcom,sc8180x-osm-l3
- - qcom,sdm845-osm-l3
- - qcom,sm8150-osm-l3
- - qcom,sm8250-epss-l3
+ oneOf:
+ - items:
+ - enum:
+ - qcom,sc7180-osm-l3
+ - qcom,sc8180x-osm-l3
+ - qcom,sdm845-osm-l3
+ - qcom,sm8150-osm-l3
+ - const: qcom,osm-l3
+ - items:
+ - enum:
+ - qcom,sc7280-epss-l3
+ - qcom,sc8280xp-epss-l3
+ - qcom,sm8250-epss-l3
+ - qcom,sm8350-epss-l3
+ - const: qcom,epss-l3
isn't it incorrect to describe qcom,epss-l3 as a working
backup compatible for sc7280-epss-l3 and sm8250-epss-l3?
Shouldn't we just add another items list with those 2 as
enums?
reg:
maxItems: 1
@@ -56,7 +64,7 @@ examples:
#define RPMH_CXO_CLK 0
osm_l3: interconnect@17d41000 {
- compatible = "qcom,sdm845-osm-l3";
+ compatible = "qcom,sdm845-osm-l3", "qcom,osm-l3";
reg = <0x17d41000 0x1400>;
clocks = <&rpmhcc RPMH_CXO_CLK>, <&gcc GPLL0>;
