On Tue, Nov 08, 2022 at 08:09:02PM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote: > On Tue, Nov 08, 2022 at 03:33:35PM +0200, Kalle Valo wrote: > > Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > > > On Tue, Aug 30, 2022 at 10:11:47AM -0700, Jeff Johnson wrote: > > >> Currently the event_cfg pointer in struct mhi_controller_config is not > > >> defined as a const pointer. This prevents clients from registering a > > >> read-only configuration unless they use a typecast. Since the > > >> event_cfg should not be modified once registered, add the const > > >> qualifier to event_cfg. This is aligned with the definition of ch_cfg. > > >> > > >> Signed-off-by: Jeff Johnson <quic_jjohnson@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > Applied to mhi-next! > > > > BTW what happened to this patch? I cannot find it anywhere. > > > > Sorry! I did apply this patch earlier locally but didn't push it to > remote. So it got lost. > > Now pushed! Thanks for spotting. > Dropped the patch now because of this: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20221109151637.67be60f8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ Since we need to modify event_cfg for using the shared IRQ, I don't think the patch is applicable. Maybe that's the reason I dropped it earlier also, but forgot to share it in mailing list. Thanks, Mani > > -- > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/ > > > > https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches > > > > -- > மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம் > -- மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்