On Wed, Oct 19, 2022 at 01:47:17AM +0800, kernel test robot wrote: [..] > 155 #define USECS_TO_CYCLES(time_usecs) \ > 156 xloops_to_cycles((time_usecs) * 0x10C7UL) > 157 > 158 static inline unsigned long xloops_to_cycles(unsigned long xloops) Any objections to me changing the type to u64 while applying the patches? Regards, Bjorn > 159 { > > 160 return (xloops * loops_per_jiffy * HZ) >> 32; > 161 } > 162