Re: [PATCH v2 12/12] arm64: dts: qcom: sc8280xp-x13s: Add thermal zone support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 03/11/2022 06:50, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
On Sat, Oct 29, 2022 at 04:29:05PM +0200, Konrad Dybcio wrote:

On 29.10.2022 07:14, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
Add thermal zone support by making use of the thermistor SYS_THERM6.
Based on experiments, this thermistor seems to reflect the actual
surface temperature of the laptop.

For the cooling device, all BIG CPU cores are throttle down to keep the
s/throttle/throttled

Is it okay to let the 4xA78C run at full throttle in thermal emergencies though?
I don't get it. Can you elaborate?

8280xp has 4xA78C and 4xX1C. You only added the latter ones to the cooling map.



temperature at a sane level.

Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
  .../qcom/sc8280xp-lenovo-thinkpad-x13s.dts    | 46 +++++++++++++++++++
  1 file changed, 46 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc8280xp-lenovo-thinkpad-x13s.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc8280xp-lenovo-thinkpad-x13s.dts
index ca77c19c6d0d..96e2fa72f782 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc8280xp-lenovo-thinkpad-x13s.dts
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc8280xp-lenovo-thinkpad-x13s.dts
@@ -29,6 +29,52 @@ backlight {
  		pinctrl-0 = <&edp_bl_en>, <&edp_bl_pwm>;
  	};
+ thermal-zones {
+		skin-temp-thermal {
+			polling-delay-passive = <250>;
+			polling-delay = <0>;
+			thermal-sensors = <&pmk8280_adc_tm 5>;
+
+			trips {
+				skin_temp_alert0: trip-point0 {
+					temperature = <55000>;
+					hysteresis = <1000>;
+					type = "passive";
+				};
+
+				skin_temp_alert1: trip-point1 {
+					temperature = <58000>;
+					hysteresis = <1000>;
+					type = "passive";
+				};
+
+				skin-temp-crit {
+					temperature = <73000>;
Ouch, I didn't know we were serving burnt fingers at the cafeteria today :D

Or maybe this just looks scary.. The laptop looks plastic, so maybe it won't cause instant
burns?

73c is what the reasonable number I came up with after some experiments. At
this point the temperature won't burn your finger but crossing this surely
would (that's what happening without this series).

Ok, then I suppose it's fine. Thanks!


Konrad


Thanks,
Mani

Konrad
+					hysteresis = <1000>;
+					type = "critical";
+				};
+			};
+
+			cooling-maps {
+				map0 {
+					trip = <&skin_temp_alert0>;
+					cooling-device = <&CPU4 THERMAL_NO_LIMIT THERMAL_NO_LIMIT>,
+							 <&CPU5 THERMAL_NO_LIMIT THERMAL_NO_LIMIT>,
+							 <&CPU6 THERMAL_NO_LIMIT THERMAL_NO_LIMIT>,
+							 <&CPU7 THERMAL_NO_LIMIT THERMAL_NO_LIMIT>;
+				};
+
+				map1 {
+					trip = <&skin_temp_alert1>;
+					cooling-device = <&CPU4 THERMAL_NO_LIMIT THERMAL_NO_LIMIT>,
+							 <&CPU5 THERMAL_NO_LIMIT THERMAL_NO_LIMIT>,
+							 <&CPU6 THERMAL_NO_LIMIT THERMAL_NO_LIMIT>,
+							 <&CPU7 THERMAL_NO_LIMIT THERMAL_NO_LIMIT>;
+				};
+			};
+		};
+	};
+
  	vreg_edp_bl: regulator-edp-bl {
  		compatible = "regulator-fixed";



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux