On Wed, Nov 02, 2022 at 02:15:26PM +0530, Shazad Hussain wrote: > On 11/2/2022 1:43 PM, Johan Hovold wrote: > > Right, but if the PHYs really requires CX and it is not an ancestor of > > the refclk then this should be described by the binding (and not be > > hidden away in the clock driver). > This makes sense, will be posting v2 post for the same. > I assume this should use the Fixes tag then ! Yeah, I guess to you can add a fixes tag for the commits adding support for sc8280xp to the UFS PHY binding and driver. But please do check with the hardware documentation first so we get this right this time. I've already asked Bjorn to see what he can dig out as it is still not clear how the two "card" refclocks (GCC_UFS_CARD_CLKREF_CLK and GCC_UFS_1_CARD_CLKREF_CLK) are supposed to be used. Johan
