On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 2:50 AM, Paul Bolle <pebolle@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Bjorn, > Hi Paul [..] > > The Qualcomm RPM regulator driver (see Kconfig symbol > REGULATOR_QCOM_RPM) was added in v3.18. It depends on the above symbol, > so it has not yet gotten build coverage. Even manual hacks like > make -C ../.. M=$PWD CONFIG_REGULATOR_QCOM_RPM=m qcom_rpm-regulator.ko > > won't work for that driver, because it includes linux/mfd/qcom_rpm.h, > which is not part of the tree. > Correct, but unfortunately Lee Jones awaits devicetree maintainers ack (or any comment) and have been doing so for months now. I did send out a ping a few weeks ago, but might have done so when they where occupied by the merge window. Lee, the Qualcomm RPM binding is not for a subsystem and is limited to Qualcomm devices. Could we apply this in accordance with II.2 in Documentation/devicetree/bindings/submitting-patches.txt or is there anything I could do to make you feel comfortable doing so? > It seems there's no generally agreed upon guideline for situations like > this. So I guess it's up to Mark to decide how long the tree should > include an unbuildable driver. > I haven't seen any guidelines, but appreciate Mark's way of working in this matter - as we've been able to run our devices with fewer out-of-tree patches. Regards, Bjorn -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
