On Friday 05 December 2014 08:45:26 Lina Iyer wrote: > On Thu, Dec 04 2014 at 11:20 -0700, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > >On Thursday 04 December 2014 09:28:34 Lina Iyer wrote: > >Having all cpuidle code generally live in drivers/cpuidle is still a good > >idea IMO, but using a platform device just for the purpose of passing > >data between some platform specific code and another platform specific > >driver hasn't worked out that well here. > > > To achieve both, I cant think of a better way to initialize the cpuidle > driver without the use of reference count (0 ==> > platform_driver_register). > > I tried creating dummy platform device in the DT but something or > another gives in to an ugly implementation. > > Any other ideas? Hi Lina, sorry for missing your mail earlier, I just replied to Daniel on this topic, when the thread popped up again. Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
