On Tuesday 16 December 2014 11:43:12 Stanimir Varbanov wrote: > >> +static int __init qcom_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > >> +{ > > > > I think it's a bug to mark this function as __init. It breaks > > deferred probing and detaching/reattaching the device trough sysfs. > > > > My bad, I have tried to avoid mismatch section warnings came up from > dw_pcie_host_init() which is annotated as __init. Do you think we need > to remove __init from dw_pcie_host_init() declaration and fix the > drivers accordingly? Yes, that's probably best. Initially, it was ok because all front-ends of the dw-pcie driver were using module_platform_probe(), but that is not the case any more, so now at least keystone, layerscape and spear13xx are broken, and I think it's safer to change dw_pcie_host_init than to rely on everyone using module_platform_probe() correctly. Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html