On 16/10/2022 13:57, Caleb Connolly wrote: > 'adc@' nodes can also be the rradc. > > Signed-off-by: Caleb Connolly <caleb.connolly@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > This patch is based on Luca's series: > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20220925211744.133947-2-luca@xxxxxxxxx/ > > Luca: feel free to apply this as a fixup if you re-send > --- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/qcom,spmi-pmic.yaml | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/qcom,spmi-pmic.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/qcom,spmi-pmic.yaml > index b5a06c1b67bb..cba25562e1da 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/qcom,spmi-pmic.yaml > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/qcom,spmi-pmic.yaml > @@ -102,6 +102,7 @@ patternProperties: > oneOf: > - $ref: /schemas/iio/adc/qcom,spmi-iadc.yaml# > - $ref: /schemas/iio/adc/qcom,spmi-vadc.yaml# > + - $ref: /schemas/iio/adc/qcom,spmi-rradc.yaml# rradc seems to be present only on few specific PMICs, so we could restrict it per compatible. Similarly like adc-tm is done. > > "^adc-tm@[0-9a-f]+$": > type: object Best regards, Krzysztof
