On Tue, Dec 02 2014 at 10:40 -0700, Lina Iyer wrote: + [...]
+static int spm_dev_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) +{ + struct spm_driver_data *drv; + struct resource *res; + const struct of_device_id *match_id; + void __iomem *addr; + int cpu; + struct cpuidle_device *dev; + + drv = spm_get_drv(pdev, &cpu); + if (!drv) + return -EINVAL; + + res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0); + drv->reg_base = devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, res); + if (IS_ERR(drv->reg_base)) + return PTR_ERR(drv->reg_base); + + match_id = of_match_node(spm_match_table, pdev->dev.of_node); + if (!match_id) + return -ENODEV; + + drv->reg_data = match_id->data; + + /* Write the SPM sequences first.. */ + addr = drv->reg_base + drv->reg_data->reg_offset[SPM_REG_SEQ_ENTRY]; + __iowrite32_copy(addr, drv->reg_data->seq, + ARRAY_SIZE(drv->reg_data->seq) / 4); + + /* + * ..and then the control registers. + * On some SoC if the control registers are written first and if the + * CPU was held in reset, the reset signal could trigger the SPM state + * machine, before the sequences are completely written. + */ + spm_register_write(drv, SPM_REG_CFG, drv->reg_data->spm_cfg); + spm_register_write(drv, SPM_REG_DLY, drv->reg_data->spm_dly); + spm_register_write(drv, SPM_REG_PMIC_DLY, drv->reg_data->pmic_dly); + spm_register_write(drv, SPM_REG_PMIC_DATA_0, + drv->reg_data->pmic_data[0]); + spm_register_write(drv, SPM_REG_PMIC_DATA_1, + drv->reg_data->pmic_data[1]); + + per_cpu(cpu_spm_drv, cpu) = drv; + + /* Register the cpuidle device for the cpu, we are ready for cpuidle */ + dev = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*dev), GFP_KERNEL); + if (!dev) + return -ENOMEM; + + dev->cpu = cpu; + return cpuidle_register_device(dev); +} + +static struct qcom_cpu_pm_ops lpm_ops = { + .standby = qcom_cpu_standby, + .spc = qcom_cpu_spc, +}; + +static struct platform_device qcom_cpuidle_drv = { + .name = "qcom_cpuidle", + .id = -1, + .dev.platform_data = &lpm_ops, +}; + +static struct platform_driver spm_driver = { + .probe = spm_dev_probe, + .driver = { + .name = "saw", + .of_match_table = spm_match_table, + }, +}; + +static int __init qcom_spm_init(void) +{ + int ret; + + /* + * cpuidle driver need to registered before the cpuidle device + * for any cpu. Register the device for the the cpuidle driver. + */ + ret = platform_device_register(&qcom_cpuidle_drv); + if (ret) + return ret;
Stephen pointed out that we would have the platform device lying around on a non-QCOM device when using multi_v7_defconfig. So instead of doing this here, we could do this in the probe.. if (!cpuidle_get_driver()) { int ret = platform_device_register(&qcom_cpuidle_drv); if (ret) return ret; } Would that be okay? The successful probe indicates that we are on a QCOM SoC, and we have not registered a cpuidle_driver before this. Thanks, Lina
+ + return platform_driver_register(&spm_driver); +} +module_init(qcom_spm_init); + +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2"); +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("SAW power controller driver"); +MODULE_ALIAS("platform:saw"); diff --git a/include/soc/qcom/pm.h b/include/soc/qcom/pm.h new file mode 100644 index 0000000..d9a56d7 --- /dev/null +++ b/include/soc/qcom/pm.h @@ -0,0 +1,31 @@ +/* + * Copyright (c) 2009-2014, The Linux Foundation. All rights reserved. + * + * This software is licensed under the terms of the GNU General Public + * License version 2, as published by the Free Software Foundation, and + * may be copied, distributed, and modified under those terms. + * + * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, + * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of + * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the + * GNU General Public License for more details. + * + */ + +#ifndef __QCOM_PM_H +#define __QCOM_PM_H + +enum pm_sleep_mode { + PM_SLEEP_MODE_STBY, + PM_SLEEP_MODE_RET, + PM_SLEEP_MODE_SPC, + PM_SLEEP_MODE_PC, + PM_SLEEP_MODE_NR, +}; + +struct qcom_cpu_pm_ops { + int (*standby)(void *data); + int (*spc)(void *data); +}; + +#endif /* __QCOM_PM_H */ -- 2.1.0
-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html