Re: [PATCH 7/9] ASoC: qcom: Add ability to build QCOM drivers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 10:52:47AM -0800, Kenneth Westfield wrote:

> +++ b/sound/soc/qcom/Kconfig
> @@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
> +#
> +# Copyright (c) 2013-2014 The Linux Foundation. All rights reserved.

Is there some kind of copyright assignment on file or something?  It's
weird to have someone else without obvious authorship own the
copyright...

> +# Permission to use, copy, modify, and/or distribute this software for any
> +# purpose with or without fee is hereby granted, provided that the above
> +# copyright notice and this permission notice appear in all copies.
> +#
> +# THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS" AND THE AUTHOR DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES
> +# WITH REGARD TO THIS SOFTWARE INCLUDING ALL IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF
> +# MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE AUTHOR BE LIABLE FOR
> +# ANY SPECIAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES OR ANY DAMAGES
> +# WHATSOEVER RESULTING FROM LOSS OF USE, DATA OR PROFITS, WHETHER IN AN
> +# ACTION OF CONTRACT, NEGLIGENCE OR OTHER TORTIOUS ACTION, ARISING OUT OF
> +# OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE USE OR PERFORMANCE OF THIS SOFTWARE.

Please just license the file under the GPL, all the drivers that get
built from here are GPLed - I can't see any reason for this to have an
odd license.

> +config SND_SOC_QCOM
> +	bool "SoC Audio support for QCOM platforms"
> +	help
> +          Support for audio in Qualcomm Technologies SOC-based systems.
> +          Say Y if you want to use audio devices that will run on IPQ806x and similar SOCs.
> +

I'd expect this to be the first thing in the file not the last.  Why are
things in here bools, shouldn't they be tristates?

> index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0a74177df75f7aa5f7fbaab35da9b92689fa3d6a
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/sound/soc/qcom/Makefile
> @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
> +#QCOM SOUNDCARDS
> +

This appears to be CPU drivers as well as sound cards (as you'd expect
for machine drivers) so the comment isn't quite right - just remove it.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux