On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 8:10 PM, Bjorn Andersson
<bjorn.andersson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> +static int msm_gpio_init(struct msm_pinctrl *pctrl)
> +{
> + struct gpio_chip *chip;
> + int irq;
> + int ret;
> + int i;
> + int r;
> +
> + chip = &pctrl->chip;
> + chip->base = 0;
> + chip->ngpio = pctrl->soc->ngpios;
I know this patch is a year old, but I'm wondering if this line is correct.
The original version of your patch from 11/23/13 said this:
+ chip->ngpio = pctrl->soc->gpio_range->npins;
and today, the line is this:
unsigned ngpio = pctrl->soc->ngpios;
I'm wondering if this line should be instead:
unsigned ngpio = pctrl->soc->npins;
I'm confused about the difference between msm_pinctrl_soc_data.npins
and msm_pinctrl_soc_data.ngpios. Variable "ngpio" is used by
gpiochip_add(), so I think it's not concerned with pin control.
msm_pinctrl_soc_data.npins appears to be the number of GPIOs, whereas
msm_pinctrl_soc_data.ngpios appears to be the number of pin groups.
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
