Re: [RFC 0/2] Qualcomm RPM sleep states

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon 24 Nov 13:19 PST 2014, Stephen Boyd wrote:

[..]
> 
> What exactly are we circumventing? I can only guess that we're talking
> about the aggregation logic?
> 

We're circumventing the fact that the regulator core doesn't have knowledge
about our multiple presented views of the same resource.

As the downstream driver shows, if we just implement the right pieces it should
work, i.e. give us the correct end result, but it will not be future proof nor
pretty. That's why I think we need to discuss how to solve it either in the
regulator driver or in the framework.

And based on your feedback, it looks like we would have to do something about
this in the framework.

Regards,
Bjorn
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux