On 27/09/2022 16:01, Robert Marko wrote:
>
> On 26. 09. 2022. 09:43, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> When BLSPI1 (originally SPI0, later renamed in commit f82c48d46852
>> ("arm64: dts: qcom: ipq6018: correct QUP peripheral labels")) was added,
>> the device node lacked respective pin configuration assignment. It
>> used also blsp0_spi function but that was probably the same mistake as
>> naming it SPI0.
>
> Hi,
>
> Sorry for making it confusing, but "blsp0_spi" is the correct function.
> Pinctrl driver and datasheets call functions blsp0-blps5, but usually in DT
> we call the nodes blsp1-blsp6.
>
> It would probably be better for me to rename the nodes to blsp0-5 instead.
OK, so instead I will add blsp0_spi to the bindings.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
