On Fri, Nov 14 2014 at 15:46 -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
On 10/24, Lina Iyer wrote:
diff --git a/drivers/soc/qcom/spm.c b/drivers/soc/qcom/spm.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..ee2e3ca
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/soc/qcom/spm.c
+#include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/kernel.h>
+#include <linux/delay.h>
Is this used?
OK. Will check and remove.
+#include <linux/init.h>
+#include <linux/io.h>
+#include <linux/slab.h>
+#include <linux/of.h>
+#include <linux/of_address.h>
+#include <linux/of_device.h>
+#include <linux/err.h>
+#include <linux/platform_device.h>
+#include <linux/cpuidle.h>
+#include <linux/cpu_pm.h>
+
+#include <asm/proc-fns.h>
+#include <asm/suspend.h>
+
+#include <soc/qcom/pm.h>
+#include <soc/qcom/pm.h>
+#include <soc/qcom/scm.h>
+#include <soc/qcom/scm-boot.h>
+
+
+#define SCM_CMD_TERMINATE_PC (0x2)
+#define SCM_FLUSH_FLAG_MASK (0x3)
+#define SCM_L2_ON (0x0)
+#define SCM_L2_OFF (0x1)
+#define MAX_PMIC_DATA 2
+#define MAX_SEQ_DATA 64
+
+#define SPM_CTL_INDEX 0x7f
+#define SPM_CTL_INDEX_SHIFT 4
+#define SPM_CTL_EN BIT(0)
Nitpick, why aren't these also tabbed out?
Ok
+
+/**
+ * spm_set_low_power_mode() - Configure SPM start address for low power mode
+ * @mode: SPM LPM mode to enter
+ */
+int qcom_spm_set_low_power_mode(enum pm_sleep_mode mode)
static?
Yeah, seem to have noticed and fixed.
+{
+ struct spm_driver_data *drv = this_cpu_ptr(&cpu_spm_drv);
+ u32 start_index;
+ u32 ctl_val;
+
+ if (!drv->available)
+ return -ENXIO;
It would be nice if we didn't need this by only registering the
cpuidle device for this CPU once we've initialized the SPM
hardware.
I did explore it. It strays our cpuidle code away from the standard code
that we are trying to go towards with idle-states framework.
+
+ start_index = drv->reg_data->start_index[mode];
+
+ ctl_val = spm_register_read(drv, SPM_REG_SPM_CTL);
+ ctl_val &= ~(SPM_CTL_INDEX << SPM_CTL_INDEX_SHIFT);
+ ctl_val |= start_index << SPM_CTL_INDEX_SHIFT;
+ ctl_val |= SPM_CTL_EN;
+ spm_register_write(drv, SPM_REG_SPM_CTL, ctl_val);
+
+ /* Ensure we have written the start address */
+ wmb();
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int qcom_pm_collapse(unsigned long int unused)
+{
+ int ret;
+ u32 flag;
+ int cpu = smp_processor_id();
+
+ ret = scm_set_warm_boot_addr(cpu_resume, cpu);
+ if (ret) {
+ pr_err("Failed to set warm boot address for cpu %d\n", cpu);
Do we want this print? Won't it start spamming the log if we go
idle and we can't set the flag? Maybe we should just be silent
and return an error.
OK. removed.
I can remove it..
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ flag = SCM_L2_ON & SCM_FLUSH_FLAG_MASK;
+ scm_call_atomic1(SCM_SVC_BOOT, SCM_CMD_TERMINATE_PC, flag);
+
+ /**
+ * Returns here only if there was a pending interrupt and we did not
+ * power down as a result.
+ */
+ return 0;
+}
[...]
+
+static struct qcom_cpu_pm_ops lpm_ops = {
const?
Ok
+ .standby = qcom_cpu_standby,
+ .spc = qcom_cpu_spc,
+};
+
+struct platform_device qcom_cpuidle_device = {
+ .name = "qcom_cpuidle",
+ .id = -1,
+ .dev.platform_data = &lpm_ops,
+};
This can be created dynamically instead of living statically.
Done.
+
+static int spm_dev_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
[...]
+
+ match_id = of_match_node(spm_match_table, pdev->dev.of_node);
+ if (!match_id)
+ return -ENODEV;
+
+ drv->reg_data = match_id->data;
+ if (!drv->reg_data)
+ return -EINVAL;
This check seems useless. We control the .data field right above
this function so there better be some reg_data.
Removed.
+
+ /* Write the SPM sequences, first.. */
+ addr = drv->reg_base + drv->reg_data->reg_offset[SPM_REG_SEQ_ENTRY];
+ seq_data = (const u32 *)drv->reg_data->seq;
Why do we need a cast?
Compiler warns otherwise.
+ __iowrite32_copy(addr, seq_data, ARRAY_SIZE(drv->reg_data->seq)/4);
nitpick: space around that / please.
+
+ /* ..and then, the control registers.
+ * On some SoC's if the control registers are written first and if the
+ * CPU was held in reset, the reset signal could trigger the SPM state
+ * machine, before the sequences are completely written.
+ */
+ spm_register_write(drv, SPM_REG_CFG, drv->reg_data->spm_cfg);
+ spm_register_write(drv, SPM_REG_DLY, drv->reg_data->spm_dly);
+ spm_register_write(drv, SPM_REG_PMIC_DLY, drv->reg_data->pmic_dly);
+
+ spm_register_write(drv, SPM_REG_PMIC_DATA_0,
+ drv->reg_data->pmic_data[0]);
+ spm_register_write(drv, SPM_REG_PMIC_DATA_1,
+ drv->reg_data->pmic_data[1]);
+
+ /**
+ * Ensure all observers see the above register writes before the
+ * cpuidle driver is allowed to use the SPM.
+ */
+ wmb();
+ drv->available = true;
+
+ if ((cpu > -1) && !cpuidle_drv_init) {
Nitpick: () are unnecessary.
OK
+ platform_device_register(&qcom_cpuidle_device);
+ cpuidle_drv_init = true;
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static struct platform_driver spm_driver = {
+ .probe = spm_dev_probe,
+ .driver = {
+ .name = "qcom,spm",
This is an odd driver name with the "qcom," part. Maybe call it "spm" or "saw"?
Sure.
+ .of_match_table = spm_match_table,
+ },
+};
+
+module_platform_driver(spm_driver);
MODULE_LICENSE()?
MODULE_ALIAS()?
MODULE_DESCRIPTION() would work?
Thanks Stephen for your time.
Lina
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
