On 24/09/2022 12:12, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
On 24/09/2022 10:51, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
From: Loic Poulain <loic.poulain@xxxxxxxxxx>
QCM2290 platform uses the 14nm DSI PHY driver.
Signed-off-by: Loic Poulain <loic.poulain@xxxxxxxxxx>
[DB: changed compat to follow the agreed scheme]
Bjorn asked to keep consistency in other case:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220829210408.gxbv6szxfwiiwrbv@xxxxxxxxxxx/
Ack. Should I use qcom,dsi-phy-14nm-2290 or qcom,dsi-phy-14nm-qcm2290?
Note we already have "qcom,sc7280-dsi-phy-10nm".
---
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dsi-phy-14nm.yaml | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dsi-phy-14nm.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dsi-phy-14nm.yaml
index bc3d0b4063c7..088a03ed5f80 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dsi-phy-14nm.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dsi-phy-14nm.yaml
@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ properties:
- qcom,dsi-phy-14nm
- qcom,dsi-phy-14nm-660
- qcom,dsi-phy-14nm-8953
+ - qcom,qcm2290-dsi-phy-14nm
Best regards,
Krzysztof
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
