Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: display/msm: Add QCM2290 DSI phy

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 24/09/2022 12:12, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
On 24/09/2022 10:51, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
From: Loic Poulain <loic.poulain@xxxxxxxxxx>

QCM2290 platform uses the 14nm DSI PHY driver.

Signed-off-by: Loic Poulain <loic.poulain@xxxxxxxxxx>
[DB: changed compat to follow the agreed scheme]

Bjorn asked to keep consistency in other case:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220829210408.gxbv6szxfwiiwrbv@xxxxxxxxxxx/

Ack. Should I use qcom,dsi-phy-14nm-2290 or qcom,dsi-phy-14nm-qcm2290?

Note we already have "qcom,sc7280-dsi-phy-10nm".


---
  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dsi-phy-14nm.yaml | 1 +
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dsi-phy-14nm.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dsi-phy-14nm.yaml
index bc3d0b4063c7..088a03ed5f80 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dsi-phy-14nm.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dsi-phy-14nm.yaml
@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ properties:
        - qcom,dsi-phy-14nm
        - qcom,dsi-phy-14nm-660
        - qcom,dsi-phy-14nm-8953
+      - qcom,qcm2290-dsi-phy-14nm
Best regards,
Krzysztof


--
With best wishes
Dmitry




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux