Re: [PATCH 2/2] iommu: arm-smmu-qcom: add sdm670 compatible

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 21.09.2022 09:31, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 21/09/2022 00:39, Richard Acayan wrote:
>> The Snapdragon 670 needs the IOMMU for GENI I2C. Add a compatible string to
>> support it.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Richard Acayan <mailingradian@xxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>  drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c | 1 +
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c
>> index b2708de25ea3..bf9653b9eb89 100644
>> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c
>> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c
>> @@ -431,6 +431,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id __maybe_unused qcom_smmu_impl_of_match[] = {
>>  	{ .compatible = "qcom,sc8180x-smmu-500" },
>>  	{ .compatible = "qcom,sc8280xp-smmu-500" },
>>  	{ .compatible = "qcom,sdm630-smmu-v2" },
>> +	{ .compatible = "qcom,sdm670-smmu-500" },
> 
> Why do we keep adding compatibles to the driver for apparently
> compatible devices?

Because Linux has not funny run on bare Qualcomm hardware ever since at least msm8x60 times and
we are not interacting with real hardware, only with Qualcomm's flawed virtual implementation
of it, that's abstracted to us through various generations of their saddening software stack. This
is also the case for many more standard components, even as far as the GIC on recent boards..

Konrad
> 
> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux