On Tue, 2014-11-11 at 09:15 +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> > Do we really want the function name in every log message?
> > IMHO this is not wise except for pure debug logs.
>
> BTW: Why UBI-X? This looks odd. Either use UBIX or ubiX.
How about something like this (untested):
From: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2014 13:56:34 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] UBI: clean-up printing helpers
Let's prefix UBI messages with 'ubiX' instead of 'UBI-X' - this is more
consistent with the way we name UBI devices.
Also, commit "32608703 UBI: Extend UBI layer debug/messaging capabilities"
added the function name print to 'ubi_msg()' - lets revert this change, since
these messages are supposed to be just informative messages, and not debugging
messages.
Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/mtd/ubi/ubi.h | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/ubi/ubi.h b/drivers/mtd/ubi/ubi.h
index f80ffab..7a92283 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/ubi/ubi.h
+++ b/drivers/mtd/ubi/ubi.h
@@ -50,13 +50,13 @@
#define UBI_NAME_STR "ubi"
/* Normal UBI messages */
-#define ubi_msg(ubi, fmt, ...) pr_notice("UBI-%d: %s:" fmt "\n", \
- ubi->ubi_num, __func__, ##__VA_ARGS__)
+#define ubi_msg(ubi, fmt, ...) pr_notice("ubi%d: " fmt "\n", \
+ ubi->ubi_num, ##__VA_ARGS__)
/* UBI warning messages */
-#define ubi_warn(ubi, fmt, ...) pr_warn("UBI-%d warning: %s: " fmt "\n", \
+#define ubi_warn(ubi, fmt, ...) pr_warn("ubi%d warning: %s: " fmt "\n", \
ubi->ubi_num, __func__, ##__VA_ARGS__)
/* UBI error messages */
-#define ubi_err(ubi, fmt, ...) pr_err("UBI-%d error: %s: " fmt "\n", \
+#define ubi_err(ubi, fmt, ...) pr_err("ubi%d error: %s: " fmt "\n", \
ubi->ubi_num, __func__, ##__VA_ARGS__)
/* Background thread name pattern */
--
1.9.3
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
