Re: [PATCH v6 4/8] remoteproc: qcom: Update rproc parse firmware callback

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 9/12/2022 4:25 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
Thanks for your time Stephen!!!
Quoting Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu (2022-09-08 06:23:38)
diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_adsp.c b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_adsp.c
index 02d17b4..207270d4 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_adsp.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_adsp.c
@@ -447,7 +447,7 @@ static unsigned long adsp_panic(struct rproc *rproc)
         return qcom_q6v5_panic(&adsp->q6v5);
  }

-static const struct rproc_ops adsp_ops = {
+static struct rproc_ops adsp_ops = {
This is sad.

         .start = adsp_start,
         .stop = adsp_stop,
         .da_to_va = adsp_da_to_va,
@@ -590,6 +590,9 @@ static int adsp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
                 return ret;
         }

+       if (desc->has_iommu)
+               adsp_ops.parse_fw = rproc_elf_load_rsc_table;
+
Why not have two different set of ops so that the function pointer table
can't be hijacked? One for the parse_fw callback? Or simply return from
rproc_elf_load_rsc_table() when has_iommu is false?
Okay. Will change accordingly.

         rproc = rproc_alloc(&pdev->dev, pdev->name, &adsp_ops,



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux