Re: [RFC/PATCH 0/5 v2] mtd:ubi: Read disturb and Data retention handling

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11/2/2014 7:02 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
Am 02.11.2014 um 15:12 schrieb Tanya Brokhman:
Back to topic.
Storing the read-counters into fastmap also not a good idea because the fastmap can get lost completely (by design).

yes,I'm aware of that. We have a default value for that case, and we're trying to avoid fastmap being invalid...

Here be dragons. Can you please share these modifications?

nothing to share yet :) work in progress. more thought then code at this point. will share as soon as have something valid...


Thanks,
//richard



Thanks,
Tanya Brokhman
--
Qualcomm Israel, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux