On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 3:33 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sunday, October 19, 2014 11:30:26 AM Thomas Petazzoni wrote: >> Hello Rafael, >> >> As you requested, here is a new version of the cpufreq-dt patches, >> rebased on top of the latest Linus tree >> (52d589a01d4545ce1dc5c3892bb8c7b55edfe714 as I write this). >> >> Compared to version 2: >> >> - Rebased on top of latest Linus tree. >> >> - Removed PATCH 3/4, which is meant to go through the mvebu >> maintainer tree. I'll push it post-rc1. >> >> - Added Acked-by tags from Viresh, since he ACKed all the patches. >> >> Could you take those patches and push them to 3.18 ? > > I've applied the series and it is in my linux-next branch now (which means that > it should appear in linux-next proper tomorrow). > > I'm going to push it for 3.18-rc2. Unfortunately this caused a regression (crash). Fix available in https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/10/27/361 Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
