On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 02:00:18PM -0500, Andrew Halaney wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 07:52:52AM -0700, Doug Anderson wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 30, 2022 at 11:47 PM Johan Hovold <johan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, Aug 29, 2022 at 09:49:46AM -0700, Douglas Anderson wrote:
> > > > Prior to commit efb0cb50c427 ("regulator: qcom-rpmh: Implement
> > > > get_optimum_mode(), not set_load()") several boards were able to
> > > > change their regulator mode even though they had nothing listed in
> > > > "regulator-allowed-modes". After that commit (and fixes [1]) we'll be
> > > > stuck at the initial mode. Discussion of this (again, see [1]) has
> > > > resulted in the decision that the old dts files were wrong and should
> > > > be fixed to fully restore old functionality.
> > > >
> > > > This series attempts to fix everyone. I've kept each board in a
> > > > separate patch to make stable / backports work easier.
> > >
> > > Should you also update the bindings so that this can be caught during
> > > devicetree validation? That is, to always require
> > > "regulator-allowed-modes" when "regulator-allow-set-load" is specified.
> >
> > Yeah, it's probably a good idea. I'm happy to review a patch that does
> > that. I'm already quite a few patches deep of submitting random
> > cleanups because someone mentioned it in a code review. ;-) That's
> > actually how I got in this mess to begin with. The RPMH change was in
> > response to a request in a different code review. ...and that came
> > about in a code review that was posted in response to a comment about
> > how awkward setting regulator loads was... Need to get back to my day
> > job.
>
> I can take a stab at this during the week here I hope.. I owe Doug for
> the slew of patches and have wanted to peek at how all the dt-binding
> validation stuff works anyways.
>
Here's my attempt after a couple hours of banging the head on the wall:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220902185148.635292-1-ahalaney@xxxxxxxxxx/
Thanks,
Andrew
