On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 9:24 PM, Lina Iyer <lina.iyer@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 23 2014 at 09:31 -0600, Ivan T. Ivanov wrote: >> >> >> Hi, >> >> On Tue, 2014-10-07 at 15:41 -0600, Lina Iyer wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> This v8 revision of the cpuidle driver is available at >>> git.linaro.org:/people/lina.iyer/linux-next cpuidle-v8 >>> >> >> Probably I missing something, but should I expect that >> once these patches are applied driver could be successfully >> compiled? > > Yes they should. >> >> >> Patches definitely break bisectability. For example [PATCH v8 1/7] >> is using <soc/qcom/pm.h> which is introduced [PATCH v8 4/7]. >> > You are right. I missed checking compilation against each patch. > Based on some discussion, I need to see if pm.h is even needed. > git test-sequence[1] is your friend. [1] http://dustin.sallings.org/2010/03/28/git-test-sequence.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
