Re: [PATCH v8 0/7] QCOM 8974 and 8084 cpuidle driver

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 9:24 PM, Lina Iyer <lina.iyer@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 23 2014 at 09:31 -0600, Ivan T. Ivanov wrote:
>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Tue, 2014-10-07 at 15:41 -0600, Lina Iyer wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> This v8 revision of the cpuidle driver is available at
>>> git.linaro.org:/people/lina.iyer/linux-next cpuidle-v8
>>>
>>
>> Probably I missing something, but should I expect that
>> once these patches are applied driver could be successfully
>> compiled?
>
> Yes they should.
>>
>>
>> Patches definitely break bisectability. For example [PATCH v8 1/7]
>> is using <soc/qcom/pm.h> which is introduced [PATCH v8 4/7].
>>
> You are right. I missed checking compilation against each patch.
> Based on some discussion, I need to see if pm.h is even needed.
>

git test-sequence[1] is your friend.

[1] http://dustin.sallings.org/2010/03/28/git-test-sequence.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux