On Fri, Aug 19, 2022 at 10:12:22PM +0200, Adam Skladowski wrote:
> Add support for the display clock controller found in SM6115/SM4250
> based devices. This clock controller feeds the Multimedia Display
> SubSystem (MDSS).
> This driver is based upon one submitted for QCM2290.
>
> Signed-off-by: Adam Skladowski <a39.skl@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/clk/qcom/Kconfig | 9 +
> drivers/clk/qcom/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/clk/qcom/dispcc-sm6115.c | 615 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 625 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 drivers/clk/qcom/dispcc-sm6115.c
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/Kconfig b/drivers/clk/qcom/Kconfig
> index 1cf1ef70e347..852888a849ae 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/qcom/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/Kconfig
> @@ -616,6 +616,15 @@ config SM_CAMCC_8450
> Support for the camera clock controller on SM8450 devices.
> Say Y if you want to support camera devices and camera functionality.
>
> +config SM_DISPCC_6115
> + tristate "SM6115 Display Clock Controller"
> + depends on SM_GCC_6115
> + help
> + Support for the display clock controller on Qualcomm Technologies, Inc
> + SM6115/SM4250 devices.
> + Say Y if you want to support display devices and functionality such as
> + splash screen
> +
> config SM_DISPCC_6125
> tristate "SM6125 Display Clock Controller"
> depends on SM_GCC_6125
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/Makefile b/drivers/clk/qcom/Makefile
> index fbcf04073f07..a732ccb3b912 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/qcom/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/Makefile
> @@ -90,6 +90,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_SDX_GCC_55) += gcc-sdx55.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_SDX_GCC_65) += gcc-sdx65.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_SM_CAMCC_8250) += camcc-sm8250.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_SM_CAMCC_8450) += camcc-sm8450.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_SM_DISPCC_6115) += dispcc-sm6115.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_SM_DISPCC_6125) += dispcc-sm6125.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_SM_DISPCC_6350) += dispcc-sm6350.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_SM_DISPCC_8250) += dispcc-sm8250.o
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/dispcc-sm6115.c b/drivers/clk/qcom/dispcc-sm6115.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..6a8994bfe9d0
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/dispcc-sm6115.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,615 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> +/*
> + * Based on dispcc-qcm2290.c
> + * Copyright (c) 2020, The Linux Foundation. All rights reserved.
> + * Copyright (c) 2021, Linaro Ltd.
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/err.h>
> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/of_device.h>
> +#include <linux/of.h>
> +#include <linux/regmap.h>
> +
> +#include <dt-bindings/clock/qcom,sm6115-dispcc.h>
> +
> +#include "clk-alpha-pll.h"
> +#include "clk-branch.h"
> +#include "clk-rcg.h"
> +#include "clk-regmap.h"
> +#include "clk-regmap-divider.h"
> +#include "common.h"
> +#include "gdsc.h"
> +
> +enum {
> + P_BI_TCXO,
> + P_DISP_CC_PLL0_OUT_MAIN,
> + P_DSI0_PHY_PLL_OUT_BYTECLK,
> + P_DSI0_PHY_PLL_OUT_DSICLK,
> + P_DSI1_PHY_PLL_OUT_DSICLK,
> + P_GPLL0_OUT_MAIN,
> + P_SLEEP_CLK,
> +};
> +
> +static const struct pll_vco spark_vco[] = {
> + { 500000000, 1000000000, 2 },
> +};
> +
> +/* 768MHz configuration */
> +static const struct alpha_pll_config disp_cc_pll0_config = {
> + .l = 0x28,
> + .alpha = 0x0,
> + .alpha_en_mask = BIT(24),
> + .vco_val = 0x2 << 20,
> + .vco_mask = GENMASK(21, 20),
> + .main_output_mask = BIT(0),
> + .config_ctl_val = 0x4001055B,
> +};
> +
> +static struct clk_alpha_pll disp_cc_pll0 = {
> + .offset = 0x0,
> + .vco_table = spark_vco,
> + .num_vco = ARRAY_SIZE(spark_vco),
> + .regs = clk_alpha_pll_regs[CLK_ALPHA_PLL_TYPE_DEFAULT],
> + .clkr = {
> + .hw.init = &(struct clk_init_data){
> + .name = "disp_cc_pll0",
> + .parent_data = &(const struct clk_parent_data){
> + .fw_name = "bi_tcxo",
It's recently been decided that we would like to avoid using fw_name in
new Qualcomm clock bindings/drivers. Can you please rework this to use
.index instead?
As done in e.g.:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220811041211.3825786-3-bjorn.andersson@xxxxxxxxxx/
Also for bi_tcxo, I'd prefer if you break that out to its own definition
that you can reuse.
> + },
> + .num_parents = 1,
> + .ops = &clk_alpha_pll_ops,
> + },
> + },
> +};
[..]
> +static int __init disp_cc_sm6115_init(void)
> +{
> + return platform_driver_register(&disp_cc_sm6115_driver);
> +}
> +subsys_initcall(disp_cc_sm6115_init);
module_platform_driver() should be sufficient, and is slightly cleaner.
> +
> +static void __exit disp_cc_sm6115_exit(void)
> +{
> + platform_driver_unregister(&disp_cc_sm6115_driver);
> +}
> +module_exit(disp_cc_sm6115_exit);
> +
> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("QTI DISP_CC sm6115 Driver");
"Qualcomm SM6115 Display Clock controller"?
> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
As reported by checkpatch, this should simply be "GPL".
Regards,
Bjorn
> --
> 2.25.1
>
